COMPARISON BETWEEN PLATE-TYPE AND TUBULAR EXCHANGERS FOR DIRTY FLUEGASES
Plate exchangers of heavy-duty design and used in demanding environments such as boilers firing oil, coal, wood or solid waste fuels, metallurgical furnaces, etc. are units specially designed to alleviate following deficiencies of tubular exchangers:
1. direct impact of dust particles on heat transfer surface
2. flow separation at the rear of the tube
3. stress of tube to tube-sheet connection
Deficiency 1 can result in premature erosion and corrosion of the heat transfer surface.

Figure 1
| |

Figure 2
|
Figure 1 shows the erosion strength of a particle function of the angle of impact on the surface. The highest erosion strength occurs at 30° and remains high between 20° and 90°. In figure 2 we can see that a tube is exposed to these angles of attack for most of the front area of the tube. This fact is limiting considerably the maximum gas velocity for the design of the tubular exchangers. In certain cases the direct impact of the dust particles on the tubes can also accelerate the corrosion (scaling) rate of the tube.
Deficiency 2 can equally result in accelerated erosion and corrosion at the rear side of the tube.

Figure 3
| |
Figure 3 shows the separation zone for the gas flow around the tube. The vortices behind the tube create a fluctuating flow condition. These frequent fluctuations of gas velocity on the heat transfer surface and the direct impact of the dust particles entrained in the vortex create favourably conditions for high rates of erosion and corrosion. This aspect has been proven by numerous researchers based on both laboratory tests and field data.
Deficiency 3 is inherent to tubular designs. Indeed, the tube to tube-sheet connection is characterized by severe stress concentrations. Due to the rigidity of the tube-sheet these concentrations of stress cannot be relaxed (e.g. by plastic deformation) and will eventually result in fatigue cracking after a relative short number of operating cycles, particularly at high temperatures.
|
CORPEX™ plate-type exchangers alleviate these deficiencies as explained below.
A. NO IMPACT OF DUST PARTICLES ON HEAT TRANSFER SURFACE

Figure 4. CORPEX™ flow channel
In the design of CORPEX™ exchangers we have totally eliminated any direct impact of dust particles on heat transfer surface. Figure 4 demonstrates this concept. The heat transfer core is provided with replaceable caps at both inlet and outlet of the channel. Only these caps are exposed to angles of impact larger than 0°. All heat transfer surface is exposed to 0° angle of impact of dust particles. This is a major improvement, which allows designing for gas velocities larger than in the case of tubular designs.
The direct results of this lack of impact are:
reduced fouling tendency
reduced erosion rate
reduced corrosion rate
B. NO FLOW SEPARATION
The streamlined design demonstrated in Fig. 4 ensures that no flow separation occurs anywhere in the flow channel.
The disadvantages (described above) of flow separation are eliminated. The exchanger can be designed for larger gas velocities and again the following advantages result:
reduced fouling tendency
reduced erosion rate
reduced corrosion rate
C. NO STRESS CONCENTRATIONS
CORPEX™ concept is characterised by reduced stress in the plate core. A system of stress-relief devices reduce the stress in the casing and flange connections. In case of severe thermal shock (maloperation, emergency situations, etc.) minute plastic deformation will alleviate the high stresses without lasting damages. A repeat of the thermal shock will find the system relaxed and the stress will be reduced. As a result CORPEX™ design can accept many more severe thermal cycles than a tubular design.
CORPEX™ exchangers can be designed as:
1. fully welded constructions;
2. non-welded (clamped) constructions.
Type 1 is characterized by zero leakage.
Type 2 has a very small leakage rate, in the range 0% to 0.5%.
Type 1 is recommended for continuous operation with a small number of operating cycles per year. The start-up and the shutdown period must be relatively long.
Type 2 is recommended mainly for frequent operating cycles (e.g. daily or weekly) characterised by fast start-up and fast shutdown.
